Ingredients: Titanium Dioxide 2.7; Zinc Oxide 10. Water, Cyclopentasiloxane, Dimethicone, Glycerin, C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate, Argania Spinosa Kernel Oil, Tocopheryl Acetate, Polyurethane-35, Polyglyceryl-3 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone, Polymethylsilsesquioxane, Avena Sativa (Oat) Kernel Extract, Xanthophyll, Retinyl Palmitate, Ascorbic Acid, Bisabolol, Hydrolyzed Jojoba Esters, Urea, Yeast Amino Acids, Trehalose, Inositol, Taurine, Betaine, Biosaccharide Gum-4, Hydroxyphenyl Propamidobenzoic Acid, Silica, Tapioca Starch, Sucrose, Pentylene Glycol, Butylene Glycol, Stearic Acid, Dimethicone/PEG-10/15 Crosspolymer, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Lauryl PEG-9 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone, PEG-8 Dimethicone, Octyldodecanol, Sodium Propoxyhydroxypropyl Thiosulfate Silica, Triethoxysilylethyl Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Hexyl Dimethicone, Aluminum Hydroxide, PEG/PPG-18/18 Dimethicone, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Phenoxyethanol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Iron Oxides (CI 77491).
Where to buy City Skin Age Defense Broad Spectrum SPF 50 PA++++ in the USA?
If you can’t find where to buy City Skin Age Defense Broad Spectrum SPF 50 PA++++ near you, we can easily help you find a place where you can quickly and cheaply buy.
You can click on “check price” button and find out where to buy to buy City Skin Age Defense Broad Spectrum SPF 50 PA++++.
How to find the best price on City Skin Age Defense Broad Spectrum SPF 50 PA++++?
We are always ready to offer you recommendations on where to buy City Skin Age Defense Broad Spectrum SPF 50 PA++++ at one of the best price on Internet.
Please, feel free to follow the “check price” button to find price we chose for City Skin Age Defense Broad Spectrum SPF 50 PA++++ .
Products You Need:
Tinted Moisturizer Broad Spectrum SPF 30 Sunscreen
Face Finishing & Firming Tinted Moisturizer Broad Spectrum SPF 30
Ultra Repair Tinted Moisturizer Broad Spectrum SPF 30
Buildable Blur CC Cream (TM) Broad Spectrum SPF 35
Super Fluid UV Mineral Defense Broad Spectrum SPF 50+
Tinted Moisturizer Natural Skin Perfector Broad Spectrum SPF 30
Facial SPF 30+ UVA/UVB Broad Spectrum
UV Pure Broad-Spectrum SPF 47
Max Mineral Naked Broad Spectrum SPF 45
UV Physical Broad-Spectrum SPF 41 – Tinted
Unseen Sunscreen Broad Spectrum SPF 40
Lip Balm SPF45 Broad Spectrum UVA UVB
drearyStork7
The only reason I got this was because my HG sunscreen was out of stock and I needed something to use while awaiting restocking. I read good reviews on this so I wanted to try it. After trying it out for myself, I’m going to have to go against the grain here and say this sunscreen just didn’t work well for me.
Pros: OK for incidental sun exposure. No white cast.
Cons: way too expensive for so little product. Not so matte and it left my face greasy after an hour of having it on. Caused me to break out on some areas of my cheeks. Last but not least, it only has 10% zinc oxide as its active ingredient. Not high enough in my opinion, especially if you live in a place with a high UV index. I read that if you’re going to be outdoors for prolonged periods, the MINIMUM for zinc oxide to be really effective should at least be 15%. The sunscreen I regularly use has 18.6% zinc oxide in it, also has no white cast and dries matte AND it’s only $17.99 for a 2.7oz product. Not a repeat buy.
madDinosaur0
This is a very expensive sunscreen but it wears well under makeup with no white cast. For my combination skin, the effect varies from time to time; it seemed to cause some pimples at times, and make my T zone oily the next. I just bought a second bottle based on those days when it worked wonderfully on my skin. I alternate this with my go-to sunscreen, Paula’s Choice Resist, especially when I sensed that my skin was about to act up. In all, I felt mixed about this product. Will update again after I finish my second bottle.
superiorPie4
This is the best mineral sunscreen I have ever used, and I’ve used most of the good ones and a few of the bad ones.
Yes, this is extortionately expensive. However, in my experience with this product it does what it purports to do. It is lightweight, semi-matte, dries totally clear (the tint is a bright peach that looks a bit much out of the tube but disappears to clear on my skin without looking like any coverage at all) and doesn’t break me out at all. I was out in the bright summer sunshine this weekend and not a hint of burn or pigmentation. Serums layer under this without any issue: no pilling. It is neither drying nor overly moisturizing and on my combination to drier skin that is a very good thing.
I am very sorry that some people have experienced such negative results with this product, but I would encourage those with rosacea who are desperate to find a great mineral sunscreen to give this a try. Get Sephora to give you a sample and see if it works. For me, it’s what I’ve been looking for and I haven’t thought twice about another product since I started using it.
brainyEland1
I am surprised by the reviews here, I do think this is a great product. The texture is lovely, it’s lightweight, blends well and looks nice under makeup. I am, however, deducting stars for the price and the ridiculously small amount you get for it. Since I have to reapply this throughout the day if I’m gonna be outdoors, I went through a bottle pretty quickly. Because of this, I’ll be sticking with LRP.
shamefulSeahorse0
In contrast to some of the other reviews below I quite like this sunscreen. It doesn’t leave a white cast and works well as a makeup base. It is neither too greasy or too drying on me, unlike some mineral sunscreens. However, it’s exorbitantly expensive for what it is. I bought with a gift card at Sephora but wouldn’t pay $80 or whatever the regular price is. For a similar effect for much less money I like the Clinique Pep-Start which is also a lightly tinted mineral sunscreen that works really well under makeup and doesn’t dry out my skin.
scornfulSeahorse0
I’m limited to physical sunscreens because of rosacea and extreme eye sensitivity. This is one of the best physical sunscreens I’ve used. It does not leave a white cast: instead it has a peachy tint, which sounds bad, but it works. It’s translucent enough to look entirely natural on my fair skin. The EltaMD physical sunscreens, my other best option, have a more noticeable makeup-like finish and tint that’s too dark on me, which is not a problem with this Murad sunscreen. It hits the right balance between moisturizing and not too greasy on my dry skin. Those with oily skin or who prefer a very matte look will probably find it too shiny. It’s not water-resistant, but it does stand up to some light sweating. I’ve had no trouble with breakouts, and I’m on my fourth purchase of this. Finally, like all physical sunscreens, it’s best removed with a cleansing oil like DHC’s or Kose Softymo.
contentHawk4
This felt great on, result was matte, not oily throughout the day, but it caused small bumps and eventually led to cystic Acne. My skin is acne prone, normal but oily when dehydrated or stressed.
yearningWasp2
As much as I want this to work, it didn’t. I have oliy combination, acne prone skin and this sunscreen was so heavy and greasy on me. So I put on some Tarte Smooth operator powder to fix it (been using this for 2 years, never had a problem). During the day I felt a bit itchy on my cheeks every time I sweat and yes, my face was shiny. Next morning there were 2 more zits on my cheek though I did double cleansing last night (What? nooo). I wanted it to work so bad cause I spent like 60 dollars on this sunscreen so I waited 2 weeks and gave it another try, however, the result was the same. Still have nearly the full bottle in my drawer 🙁
Anyway, the peach tint seems to leave no white cast, which is a good thing, and I like the package, it helps you controll the amount quite well. Also it’s easy to blend. Plus, one of my colleague tried this sunscreen and she love it. Maybe I’m just too sensitive to products that contain silicone.
And my search for the right sunscreen continues…
peskyCaviar3
I expected a really great product based on the Sephora reviews but what I got was a greasy, very average, heavy feeling physical sunscreen. I already have a few of those so won’t be keeping this one but will be returning this to Sephora.
The peach tint does keep this from giving a white cast but the texture is still too heavy and by the end of the day I can literally run a fingernail down my cheeks and scrape this off. Yuck. I have dry tight skin right now so I’m not sure whose skin this would be best for but I don’t like it for mine.Also having some rosacea eruptions that could be product related. Just not wowed by this.
unhappyFlamingo5
I read all of the reviews on Sephora about this new entry into the sunscreen arena, & the vast majority are 5-star raves, so even tho I’m not in the market for a new sunscreen, I decided to buy it so I could experience its cutting edge fabulousness first hand. (I’m not in the market cuz I love SkinCeuticals Physical Fusion UV Defense SPF 50 – tinted, but I figured there’s no harm in having 2 terrific sunscreens. FWIW, the actives in SCPF UV D are: Titanium Dioxide 6% and Zinc Oxide 5%)
The actives in Murad City Skin are: Titanium Dioxide 2.7% and Zinc Oxide 10%
Let’s put it this way, my experience with Murad City Skin is completely different from that of virtually ALL of the Sephora reviewers. This strikes me as very odd indeed, as my skin is normal & not problematic. I prefer physical ss because chemical formulas make my skin feel hot as the day goes on, regardless of the temperature outside, but I’ve never had any sort of skin reaction to chemical formulas. I used chemical formulas for many years before switching to physical.
My skin is normal, slightly dry, “mature.”
The Murad box states that this is an “ultra-light” formula. No. Even after shaking (a lot!), this goes on heavily. It’s a very thick-feeling formula as you’re spreading it on your face. Many reviewers go on & on about the matte finish. LOL. The highly-reflective shine this leaves on my face is the definition of “grease ball.” And if a heavy-feeling, greasy-looking ss isn’t bad enough, I experience a very obvious pink flush across my cheeks after applying it. The pinkness subsides a bit, but not entirely, after about 40 minutes. This happened every time I used it. For what it’s worth, the first time I tried it, I thought the pink reaction might have been because I’d used Peter Thomas Roth Un-Wrinkle Peel Pads the night before. (Note: I’ve never had any such reaction from *any* product after using PTR pads the night prior, & I’ve been using the pads for 10 years, but I just couldn’t imagine why my skin would be reacting to the ss, so I just thought that might have been the cause.)
Based on this flushed reaction, I decided to not use any peels or “reactives” of any sort for the duration of my Murad testing, just to be sure. I waited a few days before trying the Murad again, & on my 2nd try, everything was the same: heavy application, unbearably greasy shine, flushed cheeks. So that’s how this worked for me on all 6 days that I tested it. (I always allowed a few days off, between tests.) I could feel the cloying heaviness of the formula the whole time it was on my face, & there was no way to get rid of the wet-looking & feeling shine. It never “sunk in” & went away. If I would have tried to apply powder, the brush would’ve stuck to my face on first impact. And the pink cheeks remained.
Having said all this, I never broke out from this formula. Like I said, I have very normal, unperturbable skin. I never break out … even when my face is covered with this heavy, greasy, pink-inducing concoction for 6+ hours a day. But after 6 hours, I just had to wash it off: it felt so terrible. This is the length I am willing to go to in order to educate/help my friends on the Board 😀
On my final test day, I decided to apply ‘It Cosmetics CC+ SPF 50+’ on top of the Murad to see if it might help the look. Due to the always-sticky, wet feel of the Murad on my face, the only way to apply something on top of it is to gently pat it on, so that’s what I did. This managed to cancel the pink from my cheeks. It had NO impact on the high-gloss finish of the Murad, which speaks volumes, because the CC+ is very mattifying on my skin when I use it by itself. So, net-net, adding the CC+ cancels the pink, but I’m still left with a heavy-feeling, greasy-looking, terribly uncomfortable face. This is probably the least cosmetically elegant sunscreen I have ever used. Makes me wonder, a lot, about Sephora’s claim that as of 3/3/18 there are 4255 Sephora customers who “love” this product. Hmmmmmm.