Ingredients:
Where to buy Givenchy III in the USA?
If you can’t find where to buy Givenchy III near you, we can easily help you find a place where you can quickly and cheaply buy.
You can click on “check price” button and find out where to buy to buy Givenchy III.
How to find the best price on Givenchy III?
We are always ready to offer you recommendations on where to buy Givenchy III at one of the best price on Internet.
Please, feel free to follow the “check price” button to find price we chose for Givenchy III .
Products You Need:
Dior Homme EDT (2020)
After Midnight Blue
Blue Grass
Blue-Black Hair Dye
Pearlglide Intense Eye Liner in Petrol Blue
Almay intense i-color shimmer-i kit for blue eyes
Borrowed and Blue
Calypso Blue
Nail Lacquer – Yoga-Ta Get This Blue!
Ultra Last Lip Wear — 405B Blue Rose
True Blue Spa – Shea Cashmere and Silk Hand Cream
Givenchy Pour Homme Blue Label
blissfulFerret9
Once in a while, a perfume makes a person leave the consumable goods zone and enter the world of art in their heart and mind. Obviously, this is highly subjective and, in my experience, purely coincidental. With Givenchy III, it is not because I am particularly fond of the genre or notes. I love it the way I love music.
On my skin, it opens with sweetness and aldehydes. Not sterile, nostril burning or that peachy territory that can turn stale. A dark green note emerges immediately. This is galbanum, one of my favorite note ever. It is not bitter or very dark here, but it has character. Somewhere between the interplay of galbanum and sweetness, that fuzzy feeling we often get from Chanel appears. To me, this is a beautiful foreshadowing of the base. If it is animalic, it is only very slightly so.
The heart begins when these disappear to the background and then magic happens. Givenchy III becomes pure, almost blinding opulence without being screechy in the slightest. I love it when perfume is able to do this. Then I get soap, the most beautiful, elegant ivory soap. Soap notes are difficult for me. I may find them somehow humid, even stale sometimes. Not here. Who knew ivory soap could be this elegant.
Depending on the day, these phases last longer, shorter, or may even change places but they have never caused me a bad surprise.
Flowers are well-blended but the general vibe I get is that of cooler hyacinth and LOTV. Cool, vast and airy on a warm base. They tie nicely with orris later. Yes, things will get a bit powdery and maybe a bit smoky.
The drydown is fuzzy, powdery but also creamy – probably the most elegant touch of coconut this time. Givenchy is full of surprises, without losing its class or elegance. It never loses its joyful soul though. Just one second from prim and proper to laughter.
It is an easy chypre that can easily envelope its wearer. I find it approachable. It makes me think of Chanel No. 19. But while no.19 is a calm green with slight leather undertones on me, Givenchy III is slightly warmer, more yellow and more casual. Neither does it become a definite iris powder the way No.19 Poudree becomes on me.
I like it one spritz. I feel I can get the complexity better. It calms down quickly but I may spritz again during the day.
To me, this is a love affair and the reformulation I have is worth every penny.
What do you think? What are your impressions of Chanel no.19?
euphoricPudding5
I had not worn this fragrance in years, and opened the package with some trepidation. How badly was this chypriest of chypres reformulated? The good news is that while it has changed, it is still in character and the storyline is not bad at all.
This is green, dry, mossy and for adults only. Not that it is overtly sexy, because that would be too crude and obvious. This is something to live in for a while, to think about, and to appreciate as a throwback to a time when women actually enjoyed wearing difficult fragrances. But that’s not entirely fair, as the new Givenchy III can hardly be called difficult. It’s too subtle and soft. For someone who likes “sweet” or “fresh”, the initial burst may make you recoil. But here is where being an adult comes in. You wait it out. The soft, velvety green powdery notes will emerge, the initial bitterness will subside, and you will be wearing something that is timeless and elegant.
The textural equivalent would be the sound and feel of crossing your legs while wearing bottle green Shantung silk trousers.
The bottle is heavy frosted glass, devoid of frills and thrills. Understated, elegant, sleek and perfect for the juice inside.
wrathfulRaisins5
I love green. But I tried the reissue of this and did not love it. Candlewax, old fashioned and boring. Maybe the vintage was better? Reminds me of EL Pleasures.
What are some things the Green Book did wrong? I’ll find out soon.
I wrote this as a casual indulgence to my horror master. It is free and most likely to the reader. Seriously! It’s my way of telling you what to eat or take out the trash. I believe most people will be able to appreciate it but what is less likely to horrify is what was presented by further further experimentation.
So, why do I be bummed now that this book has left me?
For one thing, it is now unhinged.
I don’t buy fucking powder you hypocrite. I never used it at all. Stupid ass jump on the hashtag for goodness sake.
What about the information and typesetting that was scattered on the bottle of brownies I buy? People are getting sick of comics. They want to see what looks like a castrated cartoon handbag getting ripped up.
Read the review and you’ll be thoroughly devastated.
So that is why this is NOT for me, you morons.
The marketing makes no sense. You know what this is? All comics are limited edition comic book releases. Half of the 30,000 dollars it takes to own a movie remake are now in comic books. Seriously.
I feel guilty for thinking of myself as a premium collector for this stuff. I own a daily colored Love box. I try to take the time to come see some of the comics I own so I can tell you what I love about it. Now look at me. How excited I am to hear how fast my month turned out and how how happy I am to know that I’ve even been able to get a, uh, large freaking comic out for those 30,000 pounds I want.
Ok so now you know what those 30,000 pounds have sold for.
I just got broke and owe me 500 million dollars.
THIS BOOK WAS MY GODDAMN CHRIST! This book was broken into 2 books by my microbag boyfriend. He couldnt get those books back or his fathers couldnt do anything to have them. He did, but I didn’t believe him. By “not doing anything” he was saying “I don’t have my mind set on a
somberBagels5
Once in a while, a perfume makes a person leave the consumable goods zone and enter the world of art in their heart and mind. Obviously, this is highly subjective and, in my experience, purely coincidental. With Givenchy III, it is not because I am particularly fond of the genre or notes. I love it the way I love music.
On my skin, it opens with sweetness and aldehydes. Not sterile, nostril burning or that peachy territory that can turn stale. A dark green note emerges immediately. This is galbanum, one of my favorite note ever. It is not bitter or very dark here, but it has character. Somewhere between the interplay of galbanum and sweetness, that fuzzy feeling we often get from Chanel appears. To me, this is a beautiful foreshadowing of the base. If it is animalic, it is only very slightly so.
The heart begins when these disappear to the background and then magic happens. Givenchy III becomes pure, almost blinding opulence without being screechy in the slightest. I love it when perfume is able to do this. Then I get soap, the most beautiful, elegant ivory soap. Soap notes are difficult for me. I may find them somehow humid, even stale sometimes. Not here. Who knew ivory soap could be this elegant.
Depending on the day, these phases last longer, shorter, or may even change places but they have never caused me a bad surprise.
Flowers are well-blended but the general vibe I get is that of cooler hyacinth and LOTV. Cool, vast and airy on a warm base. They tie nicely with orris later. Yes, things will get a bit powdery and maybe a bit smoky.
The drydown is fuzzy, powdery but also creamy – probably the most elegant touch of coconut this time. Givenchy is full of surprises, without losing its class or elegance. It never loses its joyful soul though. Just one second from prim and proper to laughter.
It is an easy chypre that can easily envelope its wearer. I find it approachable. It makes me think of Chanel No. 19. But while no.19 is a calm green with slight leather undertones on me, Givenchy III is slightly warmer, more yellow and more casual. Neither does it become a definite iris powder the way No.19 Poudree becomes on me.
I like it one spritz. I feel I can get the complexity better. It calms down quickly but I may spritz again during the day.
To me, this is a love affair and the reformulation I have is worth every penny.
troubledOwl0
I had not worn this fragrance in years, and opened the package with some trepidation. How badly was this chypriest of chypres reformulated? The good news is that while it has changed, it is still in character and the storyline is not bad at all.
This is green, dry, mossy and for adults only. Not that it is overtly sexy, because that would be too crude and obvious. This is something to live in for a while, to think about, and to appreciate as a throwback to a time when women actually enjoyed wearing difficult fragrances. But that’s not entirely fair, as the new Givenchy III can hardly be called difficult. It’s too subtle and soft. For someone who likes “sweet” or “fresh”, the initial burst may make you recoil. But here is where being an adult comes in. You wait it out. The soft, velvety green powdery notes will emerge, the initial bitterness will subside, and you will be wearing something that is timeless and elegant.
The textural equivalent would be the sound and feel of crossing your legs while wearing bottle green Shantung silk trousers.
The bottle is heavy frosted glass, devoid of frills and thrills. Understated, elegant, sleek and perfect for the juice inside.
outlyingTortoise2
I love green. But I tried the reissue of this and did not love it. Candlewax, old fashioned and boring. Maybe the vintage was better? Reminds me of EL Pleasures.
sadMackerel3
I didn`t like it that much
I am not a big fan of chypre fragrance , but I bought it becouse
when I tested it at the store I thought it has notes of Jasmine
but after using it for a while I found it not that floral feminine fragrance
I thought it will be also the smell is not aromatic
worriedEagle7
Beautiful chypre fragrance. The opening is lovely mossy green and drydown is dry woody spicy along the lines of Calandre. The more I smell this, the more I like it. I think I’ll be needing a bottle for the fall.
somberCheetah4
It took a few tries, but this has really grown on me; I’m not first and foremost a chypre-lover. Initially I get a hit of florals, with rose predominant, but it then all dries down to a very nice green. Good lasting power, and very suitable for anytime wear (would be an excellent office frag). I like to wear it on cooler days, but I bet it will stand up to heat just fine. Clearly made of excellent materials.
crummyTeal6
The reformulated Givenchy III starts out bright and soapy, the scent equivalent of freshly laundered linens. As it dries down, a heart of lily of the valley emerges, which is buffered by a green and mossy base. Unlike many of the classic green chypres, Givenchy III never loses that just scrubbed quality, even in the very late drydown. Still, the hint of moss saves III from being just another Eau de Detergent. Clean Fragrances, take note: a scent can smell as pure as Ivory soap and still be fine fragrance!
ardentRelish7
Givency III is a beautiful sophisticated classic fragrance. For me it opens with a burst of lovely fresh flowers – makes me think of springtime, and then it settles down into a soft green powdery middle and bottom. I love the opening, but wished it lasted for a while longer. I also love the heart and base notes, so it is just great. It is like wearing a cashmere sweater on a fresh spring day! I’ve never smelled the original, but the new GIII is definitely “classic” in its own right. I agree with other reviews that it’s in the same ball-park as Chanel 19, which I love and wear as well. No. 19 is just bolder and greener, and “sporty” compared to GIII, which is very romantic in a classic sense. I would also suggest that GIII acts in a similar way to Annick Goutal’s Heure Exquise, which is also floral, musky, soft, and classy too. GIII is also the kind of fragrance you could wear all year round if you wanted (it is my great spring fragrance though), and could easily become a signature frag for the right person.
morbidPorpoise5
III’s basenotes are fantastic, like several of the fragrances from that era. However, I like some of their topnotes, etc., more appealing rather than the greenish notes in III.
wingedHoopoe5
Ginenchy III, dating back to 1070, now again available, type:
green-chypre.
First impressions (head-note): lily-of-the-valley, rose, jasmin – the heart is very chypré and rather woody: santal, mousse de chene, vetier, chevrefeuille (don’t know the English words). Drydown is lovely, a bit of patchouli, bergamote, incense. The basic idea here, obviously, was to create a very fresh fragrance based on a flowery, but very green accord. A young, dynamic kind of parfum, refined and elegant- perfect for all circumstances. I prefer it to Miss Dior, which is nor very popular with my freinds&family. Givenchy 3 is more likeable.