Category: Fragrances
Brand: Coty
Ingredients:
Where to buy Lady Stetson Cologne Spray in the USA?
If you can’t find where to buy Lady Stetson Cologne Spray near you, we can easily help you find a place where you can quickly and cheaply buy.
You can click on “check price” button and find out where to buy to buy Lady Stetson Cologne Spray.
How to find the best price on Lady Stetson Cologne Spray?
We are always ready to offer you recommendations on where to buy Lady Stetson Cologne Spray at one of the best price on Internet.
Please, feel free to follow the “check price” button to find price we chose for Lady Stetson Cologne Spray .
abjectEagle4
I sometimes forget about Lady Stetson being in my collection. It was never a fragrance I wore or knew much about. The name sort of turned me off which is silly probably but I figured someone who listens to Miles Davis and Ella Fitzgerald and jazz probably 99% of the time wouldn’t have anything in common with Lady Stetson.
Then several years back I had a long distance perfume gal pal who had made mention of Lady Stetson. I didn’t think much of it but she really was someone who was well versed in fragrances and had a great database of knowledge in her brain when it came to perfumes. She told me it was one of her most complimented fragrances.
In the past I’d been gifted with boxes and assortments of auction and estate sale bottles aside from my own personally acquired fragrances and in one box was a little 1/2 ounce spray of LS sitting back in the closet with some other no-so-loved scents. Just in the last three years or so I started sniffing that bottle, then wearing it. I never, in a million years, would have thought this would be a scent for me, but it is.
I do get the similarity to Nocturnes as I own a bottle. Nocturnes is a less sweet soapy perfume. Lady Stetson is smokier? more ambery maybe. It dries down to a very pretty soft and versatile fragrance. Quite wearable.
I’ve also received compliments when I’ve worn it.
I think this little drugstore gem could achieve that snob appeal status and be one of those $150 Ebay bottles you’ll see one day and think “gosh I wish I had bought a bunch of those when it was around!”
Next time you get a chance give this a sample! It could be your secret weapon!
innocentRat3
I love this powerhouse! Strong long lasting. It makes me feel good. I inhale deeply when wearing this and I mean you can smell it on yourself. All my favorites woody,warm spicy,and powdery and floral. Love the fumes! Peaches and jasmine dominate and underneath a blanket of intense flowers like lilac and hyacinth. It is wonderful. Very aldehydic and very lovely. Overall it gives me the feeling of something bright pink, soft. It has beautiful notes and tones. It is very warm and comforting. The peach notes combined with powdery aldehydic dry down seem to create a unique and fresh bouquet. Although it is an older 80s fragrance it remains classy and timeless.
pitifulBuzzard9
A cheap, happy surprise. Sparkling, peppy, and easy to wear. Like many other reviewers, I decided to give the Lady a go after it earned 4/5 stars in the 2008 Guide to Perfumes. I think the tag line was, “if a fragrance like this can’t make you happy, what can?”
Funny thing is, I am old enough to potentially have worn LS in high school in the ’80s, and it certainly was on my radar as a scent I could afford… But I had a close friend who wore it, and I honestly thought it was disgusting. A sharp, classic aldehyde with an ambery development was just not my thing. I wore linear kiddie scents like Love’s Musky Jasmin and Rain Scent, along with Bonne Bell Skin Musk. Just wasn’t ready for the big leagues, clearly.
Now that I own and wear this a lot, I can see similarities between LS and other sharp aldehydes such as White Linen, Chanel 22, and Caron Nocturnes. Perry Ellis’ original women’s scent was also along these lines. All of these fragrances are a bit like a slap in the face with soapy champagne… And I love that about them! (LS adds a bit of peach Snapple at the end that I find especially appealing.)
Reassuringly, although I bought a couple of vintage ’80s LS bottles for reference (including a parfum mini), this fragrance has become harder to find in stores, but Coty hasn’t tinkered with the formula in the meantime. When you consider what “drugstore fragrance” means now– candied body sprays and Febreze-like celebrity perfumes– it’s kind of a marvel that for $14 an ounce, you can actually wear a classic fragrance with real development, and one that smells great all the way through.
worriedBuck2
Stay away from this!! It’s cheap, nasty old lady perfume!! And I’ve noticed a lot of reviewers saying it’s an “aldehyde” scent…I’m not sure what that means but I’m thinking it’s short for formaldehyde, which fits this rank perfume to a T.
trustingLocust0
Cheap and happy, this is a winner for those who like aldehydic soapy florals. I first heard about Lady Stetson when I read Perfumes: The Guide where Tina Sanchez gave it 4 stars and compared it favorably to Chanel No. 22, calling it a peachier and more relaxed version of the former. Having forgotten what No. 22 smells like I can’t compare the two, but Lady Stetson is a pleasantly dowdy floral: lots of aldehydes up top, roses and carnations with a bit of jasmine in the heart, plenty of soap in the dry down and maybe a touch of Calone at the very bottom. Despite the price it doesn’t smell cheap– but it doesn’t smell expensive either. It has the characteristic thinness of a heavily synthetic fragrance… for example the lemony rose notes smell particularly gaunt. However, Lady Stetson gamely makes the best of it and delivers a cheerfully old fashioned soapy floral. It’s out of touch with modern tastes, but those who want a vintage style aldehydic floral and don’t mind the absence of plush naturals should give it a try.
scornfulTeal9
Love this sweet aldehydic floral. This is very much the poorer cousin of Chanel 5/22 but lovely for all that and not so hard on the purse. I would not spray my Chanel 22 everyday because it is so damned expensive. LS however, is inexpensive enough to use all the time and a good handbag scent. I had to order this from the US so duty price is an issue but I will be sure to stock up when I next visit America. One lippie off for staying power but hey at these prices you can spray lots.
somberChough7
Would I buy it again? Sure, why not? It’s $5 at Wal-Mart. I wore it all summer long with a smile on my face.
I’m not the world’s biggest fan of aldehydic florals. Chanel No. 5 has never worked for me. But Lady Stetson is so upbeat and cheerful, and she turns into such a pretty peach at the end of the day, after an initial blast of aldehydes that doesn’t last too long for me to bear. She’s got far more lasting power than many fragrances that cost 20 times as much. Who could resist smelling so good? And at that price, why would you bother?
sincereChough7
I have been unabashed in my adoration of Lady Stetson. Perhaps it’s my stubbornness.
You see, I had a heiress as a friend in graduate school. Money meant nothing to her. But as a working class kid of even more modest means as a young adult, it meant everything to me. Making ends meet until the end of the month was my biggest challenge. But that may or may not be the point.
One Christmas my heiress friend asked her two gal pals (me & another gal, whose name escapes me) what fragrance she could bestow on them. “Chanel Number 5,” my one friend squealed. “Lady Stetson,” I said. “Just Lady Stetson.” For I honestly knew not what to say. A working class kid being asked to name a gift, any gift, with the implication that money was no object.
My beau had bought me Estee Lauder Beautiful, and I hated it, just hated it. Exclamation was my perfume of choice at the time, I think. And before that, Vanderbilt and Oleg Cassini and Enjoli and Charlie. My perfumes were restricted to Walgreens … on sale. And so was my choice as restricted – Lady Stetson – as I think I had seen it advertised recently for the holidays. It seemed right up my alley.
And a few days before Christmas, the heiress had us over, for treats and cocktails. And there waiting for us were two department store, ribbon-tied boxes, from Marshall Fields no less. My friend, squealed again, and opened her Chanel Number 5. The heiress handed me my package, perhaps with the biggest gift-giving smile I had ever seen. I wondered, had she possibly given me Chanel too? And as I opened it, there was exactly what I had wanted … Lady Stetson, in all its mass market glory. She leaned over, and said, “I had them give me an extra box.” You see, Lady Stetson was not at the department store. The heiress had to make a trip to Kmart. We have been friends ever since. Both me and the hieress and me and the Lady.
No, the Lady is not Chanel 22. She was never meant to be. She captured the imagination of young American women, and I was one of them. But I think I will always remember the Lady for what she is to me … something I rarely got as a working class kid growing up … exactly what I wanted at Christmas.
curiousKitten2
To me, this is a dead ringer for the current Arpege. It’s a sweet, woody floral, plush and pleasant and a little too old-fashioned. Unfortunately, both this and Arpege give me a headache.
shamefulBagels0
Clearly, people have a love it or hate it reaction to Lady Stetson–and I tip in the love direction. I’m an aldehyde lover, so that probably explains at least some of the attraction: Lady Stetson opens with a nice shiny aldehyde hit, and softens to a creamy aldehyde floral. Others have complained of the scent lingering too long–for me, it didn’t linger long enough, and that’s what knocked its rating down for me. On a penny per minute of scent value, though, Lady Stetson is neck and neck with just about anything else out there!