Hydrating Camo Concealer

9 Reviews

1. 

   anxiousCrane1

   Reply

   So glad I tried this. Functions perfectly on my 52 y.o. dry skin. Extremely emollient and also a little goes a long way. Medium insurance coverage. Really feels terrific at first however does appear a little bit drying out later on in the day.

2. 

   jumpyMeerkat2

   Reply

   You can only submit entirely new text for analysis once every 7 seconds.

3. 

   euphoricQuiche3

   Reply

   This is way much better after that the original camo concealer which was as well heavy, drying as well as dried too quick for me. Less is certainly a lot more because of how complete the protection is but is very simple to collaborate with since it has even more of a liquid uniformity but isn’t dripping and also is also not as fast drying as the regular Camo Concealer is so you have enough time to apply and also mix. I obtained the lightest shade which is Fair Rose (fair with trendy touch) as well as it is practically a precise suit to my foundation so i directly wouldn’t use it to lighten or brighten my undereyes yet it hides my dark circles without having to apply a colour corrector below. it will penetrate lines under your eyes if you don’t set it with a powder.

   i personally like to utilize my fingers to mix it out because i find i get a great deal of insurance coverage and looks much better then with a sponge or brush yet you can most definitely make use of either one, simply as much as what you like and your skin type. it smells comparable to their remarkable foundation but not fairly as solid. it lasts all the time without vanishing or looking cakey. it does dry quicker then my Catrice concealer but no place near as quick as the origional camouflage concealer. i dislike just how huge the applicator is due to how little you need to utilize, makes it very easy to use too much

4. 

   somberBoars7

   Reply

   So glad I tried this. Works nicely on my 52 y.o. dry skin. Very emollient and a little goes a long way. Medium coverage. Feels great at first but does seem a bit drying later in the day.

5. 

   wakefulMussel7

   Reply

   This concealer is amazing. The coverage is amazing and it apply flawlessly. I used my Makeup Revaluation Banana Powder to set it .

6. 

   truthfulEggs1

   Reply

   This is way better then the original camo concealer which was too heavy, drying and dried too fast for me. Less is definitely more because of how full the coverage is but is very easy to work with because it has more of a liquid consistency but isn’t runny and is also not as fast drying as the normal Camo Concealer is so you have enough time to apply and blend. I got the lightest shade which is Fair Rose (fair with cool undertone) and it is almost an exact match to my foundation so i personally wouldn’t use it to lighten or brighten my undereyes but it conceals my dark circles without having to apply a colour corrector underneath. it will sink into lines under your eyes if you don’t set it with a powder.

   i personally like to use my fingers to blend it out because i find i get a lot of coverage and looks better then with a sponge or brush but you can definitely use either one, just up to what you prefer and your skin type. it smells similar to their flawless foundation but not quite as strong. it lasts all day without disappearing or looking cakey. it does dry faster then my Catrice concealer but nowhere near as fast as the origional camo concealer. i hate how big the applicator is because of how little you need to use, makes it easy to apply too much

7. 

   dopeyGatorade8

   Reply

   PROS

   – full coverage
   – easy to blend
   – no creasing

   CONS

   – shade range

   COMMENTS: This is what I needed! I find the original far too drying and sets too quickly (unless you have a hydrating base). This one? Beautiful. It’s a satin finish, but doesn’t make me more oily. It doesn’t crease, it’s very easy to work with, and gives me the coverage I need. Love this!

8. 

   ashamedApricots9

   Reply

   ETA – I was able to grab fair warm from my local Target, so I now have both fair warm and light beige. The shade jump between the two is pretty sharp and I am finding that fair warm pulls very pale/white/ghostly on me (NC15/20), while light beige was way too dark. I think these wear beautifully on certain parts of the face, did not emphasize my pores, but in some sections could be drying (like around my mouth area). I do think this is better on my skin than the 16hr but the shade jumping is sad. Dropped to 2 lippies as this broke me out with a large cyst after one day of wear. The 16hr version also broke me out. Ugh. Will donate.
   ——————————————————————
   I grabbed this in shade light beige, i am nc15/20 with lots of golden yellow olive tones. This hydrating version runs darker than the 16hr camo, and I saw another review mention it as well. In the 16 hr camo, light beige was a perfect match. In the hydrating, light beige is a shade too dark, and runs more orange-golden. Light warm looked too pink for me, and light beige was more yellow in the matte, but no bueno. I would have tried fair warm, which looks like a more lighter yellow option, but my store didnt have it. But the shades do run darker than the matte version.

   Other than being too dark, this wasnt near as dry as the 16hr, so thats a plus. It blended out fine with a damp sponge and a little goes a long way, but i dont think this is a full coverage as the 16hr. I cant comment on wear time, as i took this off the minute i saw it wasnt the right shade. No smell, same doe foot applicator as the 16hr. If my local stores get the fair shades in, i may retry it in fair warm.

   Ingredients: Water, Cyclopentasiloxane, Propylene Glycol, Butylene Glycol Dicaprylate/Dicaprate, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Polyglyceryl-4 Diisostearate/Polyhydroxystearate/Sebacate, Ethylhexyl Hydroxystearate, Cetyl Peg/Ppg-10/1 Dimethicone, Propylene Glycol Dibenzoate, Peg-10 Dimethicone, Disteardimonium Hectorite, Sodium Chloride, Phenoxyethanol, Dimethicone, Acrylates/Polytrimethylsiloxymethacrylate Copolymer, Dimethicone/ Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Perfluorooctyl Triethoxysilane, Trihydroxystearin, Silica, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Disodium Edta, Sodium Hyaluronate, Rosa Damascena Flower Water May Contain: Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77492, Ci 77499)

9. 

   abjectDunbird8

   Reply

   This just might be a $6 dupe for Tarte Shape Tape; so far so good. First of all being a woman of a certain age/dry skin matte concealer is no bueno. Any scaly patches or puffiness are highlighted like a neon sign. I also work a relatively physical job so sweat is a factor; I need something that’ll stay put.
   Enter this gem: I will say much like the matte counterpart it dries down VERY quickly. A little goes a long way too so expect to blend like Pat Morita is teaching you karate at 100 mph. However, after the blending it looks kind of perfect. It doesn’t look cakey or unnatural, which for $21 less than my HG is a fantastic thing. I was outside for a good part of the afternoon and it stayed where I applied it well (I live in FL and it was a warm day for January.)
   TL;DR I hate shelling out almost $30 doll hairs for Tarte. If this continues to perform well the ST can take a hike.
   Wanted to add: the range is 50 shades of fair Caucasian, at least what I could see. It would behoove them to be more inclusive as POC wear makeup too, but that’s a rant for another day.
   My Irish, glow in the dark NC25 self got medium Peach which was a decent shade match & similar to my light/medium honey in the Tarte ( as far as tone.)